The Man Who Loved Women

1983

Comedy / Drama / Romance

Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 33% · 12 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 39% · 1K ratings
IMDb Rating 5.2/10 10 2440 2.4K

Plot summary

A womanizing sculptor seeks help from a psychiatrist to cure him of his obsession with women.



October 25, 2023 at 07:36 PM

Director

Blake Edwards

Top cast

Marilu Henner as Agnes
Kim Basinger as Louise
Barry Corbin as Roy
Burt Reynolds as David
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
1014.01 MB
1280*720
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 50 min
Seeds ...
1.84 GB
1920*1080
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 50 min
Seeds ...

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by SnoopyStyle 5 / 10

American remake

The many women of sculptor David Fowler (Burt Reynolds) have gathered for his funeral. Among them is his psychiatrist Marianna (Julie Andrews) who recounts the story of his womanizing. He was living with Courtney Wade but he became enamored with a pair of legs. He chased the legs to Agnes Chapman (Marilu Henner) but she claimed that the legs are actually her cousin. There's Nancy who he saved from prostitution and put to work as one of his helpers. There's Louise (Kim Basinger), the wife of rich Texan Roy Carr (Barry Corbin). Louise shoots Roy and David has to testify in her trial. It's a long line of women and Marianna could be next.

This is a remake of a French film from director Blake Edwards. I'm sure the French original had an art house appeal. Edwards has no such cushion to work with here. In the end, not all of the women are compelling. The least appealing is probably Basinger. Reynolds is not that much better. He may be a sex symbol back in the day but his persona lacks an intellectual aspect that is required by this role. There are a few intriguing stories but these women are dropped all too quickly. His story is not compelling.

Reviewed by SolidSnake86XX 7 / 10

Thoughtful Flick

I just saw The Man Who Loved Women, and I found it to be a rather delightful movie. It's a plot you don't see to often; it's focused on one man and his love of women. The movie may seem pointless, but you'll get it once you see the ending. I won't ruin it here, but it was kind of depressing and unexpected, and looking back on the movie, I enjoyed it much more afterwards than during. It's not the most exciting movie. You won't see any amazing or dynamic cinematography or camera angles that are all to creative. In fact, it seems more like a movie from the '70's than 1983 in the way it was filmed, but if you like the kind of movies that you enjoy much more after having looked back on everything, I think you'll find this a rather enjoyable work.

Reviewed by David-240 5 / 10

What happened Blake?

Blake Edwards in the Sixties was an amazing director, with a strong visual flair. I mean he directed "Breakfast at Tiffany's", "Days of Wine and Roses", and "An Experiment in Terror"! But somewhere in all that Pink Panthering he did in the Seventies he lost that visual flair and became boring. The only film in the last thirty years that showed any of the old panache was "Victor/Victoria". It's like there are two Blake Edwards.

That's not to say that this film is terrible - it's just that I think he could have done so much better. It's so dull to look at - despite the presence of his enchanting wife Julie Andrews, and one of Burt Reynolds' best performances. Also of note is a very young Kim Basinger displaying a strong flair for comedy. But Edwards' pacing of the action is so slow and ponderous that the moments of slapstick comedy seem completely incongruous and fall completely flat.

Come on Blake - give us some more of that old magic! I know it's still in you.

Read more IMDb reviews

No comments yet

Be the first to leave a comment